You must log in or register to comment.
The church in -1AD: “Jesus is a threat to our society! We have to do something about him.”
The church in 1AD: “What an amazing person Jesus was, join us in singing songs about him.”
It’s easy to praise a revolutionary mind after they’re no longer a threat to your status quo.
-1AD? So 1BC, which is before jesus was born? Do you mean ~33AD and ~34AD? Also, the church would not have been condemning Jesus as it was established after his death. You might be thinking of a Synagogue and pre-Christian Judaiism.
C’mon bro you know they mean the state-sanctioned religion before and after Jesus.
I’m disappointed in the community note. You’d think they’d have learned the thing most high school seniors do/did. Don’t quote the Wikipedia article. Instead, quote the reference in the Wikipedia article. Much stronger of an argument.
Wikipedia editor here; there’s some nuance. This article is listed as a Good Article, meaning it’s been reviewed by another (almost certainly) experienced editor for verifiability, prose and style, coverage, neutrality, stability, etc. This was attained in 2013, and especially for such a prominent article, slipping below those standards is a recipe to get GA status revoked. Presumably this note is summarizing a large portion of coverage by Wikipedia and thus a variety of sources. You want to read and cite all of the sources rather than Wikipedia in something like a research paper, but for just a community note, there’s really nothing wrong with this.
