

If your neighbour can also get symmetrical internet with a residential contract, then that would be the better example to prove his point wrong.
A business contract is not a good comparison because they usually are symmetrical for a premium price regardless of the quality of the residential internet in your area.
Even in my country you can get symmetrical internet with a business contract, yet I’ll never claim my country’s internet is comparable to one that do provide it for a normal residential connection, because we don’t have that option here.
And he did say his internet was a normal domestic internet, btw.
You’re not making a good look for your stance when you over hyperbolize the situation.
I needed to hyperbolize the situation because you can’t seem to grasp why a business line wasn’t a good comparison, as you can see from how it works in my country. All you needed to do was provide the point that the symmetrical internet is not exclusive to a business contract and it would have made your argument completely valid.
Man, you’re still missing the point and you wonder why I had to resort to hyperbole. Nvm, since you don’t actually seem interested with disproving his point effectively and still want to compare prices despite it being irrelevant to the actual point, there’s not much use with continuing this discussion. You’ve provided information that proved half his point about US internet is incorrect, and that’s good enough for me.