• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Does anyone really recommend Ubuntu these days? I think Mint has reigned supreme for years, at least for beginners.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I recommended Mint to my partner and she wasn’t too enthusiastic about it after trying, I have Ubuntu on one of my laptops where she has a guest account and she actually prefers it even after hours of use so her new laptop is getting 24.04. I did do the diligence of explaining that Ubuntu is to Canonical as Firefox is to Mozilla, and why some Linux heads aren’t a fan.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Since bookworm, I find little need to push them past Debian. It’s clean and runs all the things.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I barely see people recommend mint anymore. It like every other Ubuntu family distro keeps having too many issues and poor gaming support compared to the steamOS styled distros.

      Everyone is going to bazzite or cachyOS as the new “noob” distros cause they just work and play steam games and have steam deck isos.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          How does mint have “poor gaming support”?

          1. The last time they tried it was ages ago, or they followed some old instructions.
          2. They’re trying to play a game that has serious anticheat aspirations and doesn’t run well on linux
          3. They want to play roblox.
      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s funny to see so many different echochambers at play. 🤭 No offense of course.

        Mint is still by far the most popular distro, I even saw Goodwill selling computers with it now. Ubuntu is also widely used, apparently it’s really popular in India(?). Meanwhile in hackspaces NixOS and Arch are super popular. Personally I like OpenSuse, therefore hear a lot about that family of distros. We’re existing in a super diverse ecosystem.

        It’s just annoying when people recommend stuff not because they think it’s the best pick for the person who’s asking, but because they like it best (I swear on my grave, I god damn saw people recommending NixOS for elders and Arch Linux for productivity environments that must be 100% stable). Therefore I made a meme about it.

  • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    Imo a just works, deb based kde distro with nvidia drivers, flatpaks and no snaps is what we need to bring forth the year of the linux desktop.

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      And one that you can get pre-installed on devices you can purchase. The “just buy and be happy” aspect is important for a lot of people as well, not to mention the valuable customer support. People with dispensable income who wish for this are usually furthest away from hackerspace culture though, so a lot of Linux enthusiasts seemingly overlook it. Or, when it comes to far-left people around, want to overlook it.

      If I remember correctly TuxedoOS checks all those boxes. And I think if you want “same but Gnome” that would be SlimbookOS. 🤔

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I dunno, we live in the age of ChatGPT. Between my generic but sufficient computer skills and ChatGPT’s hallucinatory ramblings, I’ve been smooth sailing on EndeavourOS for a few weeks now.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    I want to install fooFlorp2!

    check nixpackages:

    "
    environment.systemPackages = [ pkgs.fooFlorp2 ];

    or nix-shell -p fooFlorp2 "

    edit configuration.nix, add pkgs.fooFlorp2

    install happens, won’t work, no mention about the binary

    Web search

    ohh you don’t install it with pkgs, there’s a systemd that has to be enabled, and some config wrapped around it.

    But the documentation said…

    The documentation doesn’t lie, but it often doesn’t give you the whole answer either.

    I love nix, but installing anything interesting ends up with a lot of websearches.

    On the upside, my home/work and travel pc’s are all just lockstep. anything I install on one just ends up on the others, and that’s something cool.

    • ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      As a person who just barley figured out how to install Mint in some laptops most of that looks like a foreign language to me.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        heh, that’s even the easy part, it has a whole language that comes with it too. Getting up and running on NixOS with home-manager and flakes makes Arch install look like Candy Crush.

        But it has lots of super-powers once you learn it. Steep curve though, and it never gets fully better, to this day it’s a search or two when I install something I’ve never used before.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    No don’t use Nix they’re evil. Use Lix or Auxolotl or Tvix or Tangram or Brioche or Guix

      • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        There was some politically charged drama… I think. There was some drama, anyway. I’m not clear on the details.

        It was probably a Twitter-tier disagreement that was blown way out of proportion by a small group of people. If others have details, please don’t enlighten me, I value my ignorance.

        • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Overall linux is insecure and trash. Everyone should use temple os. Its the only os whose creator made an os to evade cia, thus making it secure.

    • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      When my win 10 gaming box EOLs this fall, I’m probably going to jump it straight to arch, since it looks like the most straightforward way to build a Steam OS like system.

      • seralth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        If you want a steam OS just use cachy they literally have a steam deck img that is just steam OS minus the immutable bits for all realistic purposes.

        • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Was going to be skeptical about an obscure distro, but I see they are currently #2 on Distrowatch. Can’t believe I’ve never heard of it before.

          Appreciate the recommendation, I’ll def look into it!

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      My gaming PC has been running EndeavourOS for about a year now. First ever time running any spin of arch and it’s been a stellar expirience. You can pry this desktop from my cold dead hands, I love it.

      • PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If you get bored later on try CachyOS. An update borked my eOS install and somehow screwed up my snapshots. So rather than deal with it, I tried out Cachy (Arch base) and just never went back. It has some quirks, but I haven’t had any issues for the past 6 months. And it’s fast.

        https://cachyos.org/

      • lennyuncle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I know that there is arch based distros that are more user friendly but I was talking about clean arch and not about arch based distros.

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Oh yeah sorry I didn’t mean for it to sound like I was contradicting you, I just love my EndeavourOS install so much I couldn’t help but chirp up! I would not recommend any arch to a new user, including EndeavourOS.

  • ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I see a lot og talk here abotu wha tis best. I want to play my games and work on my papers. I have mint right now but is there a better choice fro a beginner?

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you’re already on Mint and it works for you it’s a great OS to work with, so no inherent reason to switch. However if you look for something more modern with the same Desktop Environment as Mint (Cinnamon) perhaps Fedora Cinnamon is something for you (doesn’t use apt though). The most modern features you’ll find on a distro with KDE (Cinnamon for example is behind with support for modern stuff like HDR).

      You’ll get tons of recommendations when it comes to modern KDE distros. Personally given you said you’re a beginner I’d suggest giving TuxedoOS a shot, as they

      • Got the Nvidia drivers preinstalled
      • Are based on Ubuntu (Best compatibility)…
      • …which is the same base as Linux Mint (so .deb still work)
      • Got the App Store all set up optimally (some distros don’t)
      • There’s a hardware supplier if you ever look for sth.

      Some negatives:

      • Comes with Tuxedo Software superfluous to you (removable of course)

      Depending on your beliefs it might be a negative that it’s made by a company. However Tuxedo is based in Germany (therefore GDPR applies), they’ve people work full-time on it and a good track record for many years now. Also having the Nvidia driver pre-installed is really good in my experience, only very few distros do that due to license stuff. Otherwise of course there’s also Kubuntu or Fedora for something with KDE. You can test all of them on DistroSea in your browser.

      Feel free to ask anything. 🙂

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’ve had some people here tell me about POP_OS as it’s the most friendly to NVIDIA hardware and also is configured for gaming.

    What are your thoughts?

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It being good for Nvidia hardware isn’t wrong, but it being the best or especially good for gaming isn’t exactly true. It mostly boils down to the proprietary Nvidia driver being preinstalled and a lot of media attention why Pop!_OS became so popular for gaming.

      Other distros that are just as good or better for gaming with Nvidia are, for example:

      • Bazzite (Immutable)
      • Nobara
      • TuxedoOS

      The first two are really going the extra mile for patches and gaming support. Bazzite can be a little bit frustrating though given it requires some additional knowledge to work with immutable file systems if you ever need to edit system files. Otherwise you should have a solid experience on any of them.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nice report for “astroturfing”. Please go ahead and point out which rule was violated so I can make a decision.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Leave it, tos 8 covers my point and yes its a case of my butthurt but its a recent pattern across communities in lemmy atm that seems to have started a nasty attempt thats trying to grow a grassroots campaign, this may not be one. Just reporting for your sake and others to raise awareness based on some social controversy in the distro. We should be lifting distros (and people) up not burning them for fake reasons

        • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t see how this might be interpreted as misinformation (8) or any attempt to do harm (8.1) either to a prospective user or Nix itself. Nor do I see how this might be an attempt made or supported by the Nix developers to influence the greater community. If you have evidence to the contrary, produce it.

          There is no denying that a vocal group of people are promoting immutable/atomic distributions, or that many are fans of Nix’s declarative configuration solution. Still, that makes it no worse than the people who are pushing back against the adoption of Rust in the Linux kernel, or the proliferation of systemd services, or the adoption of Wayland over X11.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        86
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_From_Scratch

        Linux From Scratch (LFS) is a type of a Linux installation and the name of a book written by Gerard Beekmans, and as of May 2021, mainly maintained by Bruce Dubbs. The book gives readers instructions on how to build a Linux system from source. The book is available freely from the Linux From Scratch site.

        LWN.net reviewed LFS in 2004:[19]

        Linux From Scratch is a wonderful project. It should become a compulsory reading material for all Linux training courses, and something that every Linux enthusiast should complete at least once. This would also create another interesting side effect: people who tend to be quick in expressing dissatisfaction on the distributions’ mailing lists and forums would probably show a lot more respect for the developers. Installing a ready-made distribution is a trivial task. Building up a set of 4 CDs containing a stable, secure and reliable operating system, plus thousands of applications, is most definitely not.

        • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          This just reminds me of my first experience with Linux in the late 90’s. Yes they had installers that got the base system working, but then you had to compile so much.

        • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I did this once. I got to a command line installation and I think I either borked installing a usable desktop environment, or I was just sick of it all and decided I wouln’t be getting working hibernation or Wi-Fi this way anyway and the slightly lower resources used wasn’t worth it.

          I think I had tried Gentoo before that and must have decided I didn’t like myself for some reason.

          • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            “Some DIY is fun, some is stuff we do by mistake because ‘well how hard can it be anyway?’ and it teaches us a lot for the next project. The rest we do purely to spite ourselves, because we should be able to do it, damnit!”

            -thing I said to a friend who asked why I was putting so much effort on myself when I could just buy a flat-pack for the same cost and 99% less effort.