I mean, just declare a republic ffs.

  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, what’s you point?

    I have given you a list of poor democracies that are ‘republics’ and a list of strong democracies that many/most of which are a constitutional monarchy of some flavour or another.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      And I have given you a list of poor democracies that are ‘constitutional monarchies’ of some flavour or another.

      My point is that you’re using correlation to prove causation.

      • Merva@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You are arguing from ignorance. The terms republic and democracy and so on have rather solid definitions in political science. Republic is not a very informative descriptor of the poltical system of a country, it just means that the role of head of state in’t heritable, ie. that it isn’t a monarchy. The actual political system of a republic can be basically anything except a monarchy.