3rd party body you’re referring to was conducted by the same patriotic cult government-in-shock that was just attacked. I meant an international one.
What exactly would an international investigation go over that the commission didn’t? First you said it has to be a 3rd party, then an international third party, if that was done you’d probably claim that it should have been done by an adversarial nation.
If you have actually criticism of the work conducted and not who was conducting it might be a valid argument.
No need to start using slurs, makes you look like you can’t win with proper argumentation.
Lol, your entire argument has been arrogant, you have implied multiple times that people who don’t agree with you just haven’t evaluated the problem as much as you have or just aren’t as capable of understanding.
You can’t insult people’s intelligence and then say the stupidest shit possible and not expect to be called an idiot.
engineering lefties who laugh at RBG’s death” and that’s somehow relevant to what I’m saying.
Lol, is that the only part of the hour and a half program that step by step explains how the towers fell that toy listened too? The whole thing is over 9/11 of course it is relevant… That particular part is someone finding out just how screwed the country was at that time, and they dealt with it by laughing. Did you not listen to the surroundings context?
Jet fuel can weaken steel and that can help the collapse, but not at the speed we saw on camera. If you want sources, you can use a search engine. If you like engineers, go find the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth.
Lol, the group that’s been debunked several times?
“In 2008, Zdeněk P. Bažant, professor of civil engineering and materials science at Northwestern University, published with three coauthors a paper to examine whether allegations of controlled demolition might be scientifically justifiable. They found that the available video records are not consistent with the free fall hypothesis, that the size of the concrete particles is consistent with comminution caused by impact, and that the high velocity of compressed air explains why material from the towers were ejected to a distance of several hundred meters from the tower. The authors conclude that the allegations of controlled demolition do not have any scientific merit.[53] A spokesman for NIST said that any sightings of molten metal, including metal seen pouring from the South Tower, were likely molten aluminum from the airplane, an explanation disputed by Gage who stated that the color of the molten metal rules out aluminum.[54] “Basically, gravity and the utter force of the upper floors forced the towers down,” said NIST spokesperson Michael Newman.[48]”
That group thinks people planted nano thermite… Which has never been used to demo a building before.
Again with the insults of intelligence. You need to work on your reasoning and debating skills.
Lol, you started it…
Even the Reuters fact check calls it misrepresenting, not false. He did say that that day. It didn’t go missing overnight is the “misrepresentation”.
No, they said that rumsfield was misquoting an auditing report that said that 2 trillion in spending wasn’t supported by proper auditing trails while 2.6 trillion was. Basically the government wasn’t handling their receipts very well, not that 2.6 trillion dollars vanished.
How exactly did this spending support your argument in the first place?
Hypothesis: A close ally of the US attacked the US to coerce them into & drum up public (& international) support for decade long wars to setup more wars so eventually the death cult can have the greater state to control all the holy lands of the middle east.
Why are you so afraid to just say you think it was Israel? That’s obviously what you are alluding too. If it was Israel, wouldn’t you think they’d just pin it on Iran in the first place? Why pin it on Afghanistan, or Iraq? Why risk Americans becoming tired of conflict in the Middle East?
You may not understand that because you may listen to maniacal laughing engineering podcasts, you don’t understand covert cult power and how these factions have worshipped and warred for their death cult dogmas for centuries. Nor do you seem to grasp how human psychology and mass psychosis works.
Lol, you don’t see how this is belittling or insulting? You aren’t making any claims, you’re just attacking my ability bro comprehend… Yet when I call you a dolt, you call foul. “You need to work on your reasoning and debating skills.”
are good at trying to make people ont he internet feel small though. Digital chest bouncing isn’t really a Lemmy thing here, we try to have respectful dialogue. If you can’t do that, Reddit will probably gladly take you back.
Nothing you said was respectful dialogue. Your only argument is that avoiding making any claims by saying I wouldn’t be capable of understanding your claims.
Again, if your going to make claims based on nothing but antisemitism, just say it with your chest. I’m not a fan of the geopolitics of the Israeli state, but I don’t wrap my criticism in antisemitic language like calling the a death cult.
What exactly would an international investigation go over that the commission didn’t? First you said it has to be a 3rd party, then an international third party, if that was done you’d probably claim that it should have been done by an adversarial nation.
If you have actually criticism of the work conducted and not who was conducting it might be a valid argument.
Lol, your entire argument has been arrogant, you have implied multiple times that people who don’t agree with you just haven’t evaluated the problem as much as you have or just aren’t as capable of understanding.
You can’t insult people’s intelligence and then say the stupidest shit possible and not expect to be called an idiot.
Lol, is that the only part of the hour and a half program that step by step explains how the towers fell that toy listened too? The whole thing is over 9/11 of course it is relevant… That particular part is someone finding out just how screwed the country was at that time, and they dealt with it by laughing. Did you not listen to the surroundings context?
Lol, the group that’s been debunked several times?
“In 2008, Zdeněk P. Bažant, professor of civil engineering and materials science at Northwestern University, published with three coauthors a paper to examine whether allegations of controlled demolition might be scientifically justifiable. They found that the available video records are not consistent with the free fall hypothesis, that the size of the concrete particles is consistent with comminution caused by impact, and that the high velocity of compressed air explains why material from the towers were ejected to a distance of several hundred meters from the tower. The authors conclude that the allegations of controlled demolition do not have any scientific merit.[53] A spokesman for NIST said that any sightings of molten metal, including metal seen pouring from the South Tower, were likely molten aluminum from the airplane, an explanation disputed by Gage who stated that the color of the molten metal rules out aluminum.[54] “Basically, gravity and the utter force of the upper floors forced the towers down,” said NIST spokesperson Michael Newman.[48]”
That group thinks people planted nano thermite… Which has never been used to demo a building before.
Lol, you started it…
No, they said that rumsfield was misquoting an auditing report that said that 2 trillion in spending wasn’t supported by proper auditing trails while 2.6 trillion was. Basically the government wasn’t handling their receipts very well, not that 2.6 trillion dollars vanished.
How exactly did this spending support your argument in the first place?
Why are you so afraid to just say you think it was Israel? That’s obviously what you are alluding too. If it was Israel, wouldn’t you think they’d just pin it on Iran in the first place? Why pin it on Afghanistan, or Iraq? Why risk Americans becoming tired of conflict in the Middle East?
Lol, you don’t see how this is belittling or insulting? You aren’t making any claims, you’re just attacking my ability bro comprehend… Yet when I call you a dolt, you call foul. “You need to work on your reasoning and debating skills.”
Nothing you said was respectful dialogue. Your only argument is that avoiding making any claims by saying I wouldn’t be capable of understanding your claims.
Again, if your going to make claims based on nothing but antisemitism, just say it with your chest. I’m not a fan of the geopolitics of the Israeli state, but I don’t wrap my criticism in antisemitic language like calling the a death cult.