• modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Years ago, when this policy was first being contemplated, someone at google plugged a number, likely larger than this, into a spreadsheet analyzing the cost/benefit of spying on their customers.

    This is just post-activation operating expense from their perspective.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Google made 100 billion last year.

      300 million is barely a blip.

      The fine should have been 30 billion.

      if the fines arent big enough to seriously hurt a company, Then the fines are not big enough to change their behavior.

      They just become a tax on evil.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Base it not off the entire company, base it off the value of doing this. They didnt make 100 billion off unapproved android user data collection.

        This argument is common and while fines should be higher, the idea that they dont matter unless they are 10% of earnings is ridiculous.

      • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you earn like 100k a year its like being slapped with a 300 $ fine just to put it into perspective.