On their official website!

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    As a linux user you should know that all VPN companies are as trustworthy as a chronic liar, and therefore not rely on one. So it doesn’t matter that they don’t support Arch, really. And even good that they don’t support Tails.

      • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Probably TOR.

        I hear I2P had a lot of potential, but also a lot of issues. Haven’t checked up on that project in a bit. I know it was a BITCH to set up when I tried plinking with it some years ago.

        So TOR (despite the latency/speed issues and its own security concerns) is still probably about as good as it gets.

          • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Completely agree.

            Kinda get the vibe that guy I’m replying to is asking for the times when its actually needed. If I’ve got the wrong mark there and they’re looking for daily driving, then Mullvad VPN (or comparable) is probably the better way to go.

            • Badabinski@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              Yeah, Mullvad seems to have done the most to prove that they’re not harvesting your data. You still have to trust them, but there’s evidence that they’re trying.