not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agospectrum rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1589arrow-down15
arrow-up1584arrow-down1imagespectrum rulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·23 hours agoYou’re assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral. Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·22 hours agoAccording to that logic, straightness would be heteromorphic to the set ℝ². Destroyed by pure logic
minus-squareborokov@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·22 hours agoYou’re right, I’ve mixed denombrability of the set and sortability of the measure (don’t know if it is the right words in engkish). On my side, I’m not sure about dimension or continuity of gayness norm.
minus-squarevrojak@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 hours agoSo instead of general gayness, you have an axis for twink attraction and bear attraction?
You’re assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral.
Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².
According to that logic, straightness would be heteromorphic to the set ℝ².
Destroyed by pure logic
You’re right, I’ve mixed denombrability of the set and sortability of the measure (don’t know if it is the right words in engkish).
On my side, I’m not sure about dimension or continuity of gayness norm.
So instead of general gayness, you have an axis for twink attraction and bear attraction?