why settle for \n when you can go for the stylish carriage return
It’s impossible to represent that on paper. It could be misrepresented as a specific number of spaces. Depending on the position on the paper, it may also be hard to tell if the carriage return comes with the line feed. Unless you want the document to be in ASCII or EBCDIC hex, it’s like writing an ambiguous math problem where the answer is different depending on how you were taught about the order of operations. Don’t do this to your kid, Abcde.
C programmers would ask whether a null-terminated name would be acceptable
Frontend devs hates this guy.
Still better than Jennifer Null I guess
Apparently no-one did it yet, so I’ll name my child +++ATH0
Be funny as fuck if Canada started extradition procedures when he landed
Not legal in Sweden. Our “IRS” must also accept the name and deem it legal.
I for one like this. As it stops some very stupid people to name their children some very stupid names. Such as “Adolf Hitler”.
And yes. Someone did try to name their child this and they were appropriately stoped from doing it.
ugh literally 1984
Should have went with Adolf Olivernipples
Ask Robert’); DROP TABLE Students; 's mum how it went.
Anyone remember when Chrome had that issue with validating nested URL-encoded characters? Anyone for John%%80%80 Doe?
No, cause “John\nDoe” messes up my regex. Sorry, out of the question. I’m not good with regex.
Na, names are about pronunciation (how you call someone). Written letters are an approximation of that. You can’t pronounce a newline, so there’s that.
Just crouch down to simulate moving to a lower line.
John <crouch> Doe
Not legal in Canada. Your legal name must use Latin characters only. This is a sore point for indigenous people.
Which is both entirely understandable, and also tragic because Canada’s indigenous written characters are so cool. :D
But also, it’s gotta be neat having a name among your people, that “the state” has nothing to do with…
Can I kill someone who wants to do this? How do I legally get away with it?