data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11101/11101a2e1089ca2b100350a3a436bcaa2270037f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18141/1814163ec5385cb676a61d1f37d53aa16c39097c" alt=""
“I think” applies to the reason for an evolutionary trait. They’ve presented that trait as fact.
“I think” applies to the reason for an evolutionary trait. They’ve presented that trait as fact.
Stop? Somewhere around 1/3 of the diameter for a 45deg sloped pyramid, adding more layers would start projecting off the sides, offering no additional support for the new layer. Drawing a teardrop shape with a perfectly circular head and perfectly tangential tail with be the same as a cross section of this planet/pyramid
I’m not convinced Mt Everest represents the most weight normal earth can sustain but rather the most height gained by regular tectonic motion. However, I stead of asking how much weight can stony earth support before collapsing, it leads me to ask how much weight can the crust support before buckling? Perhaps this project has diminishing returns as more weight above causes the crust to bulge downward and compensate.
I don’t see why the base would have to be flat. It could have a spherical volume carved out the bottom to accommodate the goofy little planet below
Room temperature water because I chug a pint at a time and get on with my day. My bean water? Also room temperature, but because it’s the temperature that takes the least amount of work across preparation, storage, and consumption.