It’s so strange to see folks randomly adopt this hardcore grindset mentality when AI is mentioned.
At this particular moment, for this particular task I am not seeking to improve my skills
OH, Well I guess you’ve never cared about a thing in your life and you want robots to take all your joy and fuck your wife??
Gender fluid
You as well!
Good to know, I am sorry our politics are such a fucking problem for everyone!
My point isn’t so much about the party they should ‘join’. I know we are having this conversation in the context of a country that largely aware of the different parties and broadly what they feel about them. Be seeing as this a time of necessary reflection for the democratic party, and in turn reflection for their base, I think it’s worth looking harshly at what they really were before the currently administration. That a party that was offered as pro-worker, anti-war, pro-immigration, pro-trans issues, has become a party of, ‘strike breaking’, ‘most lethal military’, ‘tough on illegals’, and ‘following the law’.
I think it’s valid to classify many in the party as evil because they are either doing evil or capitulating to it, and we need to have a conversation about how much about them needs to change.
I understand and respect optics arguments, but I think this is why I don’t know that we agree to the degree you think we do.
It seems that you think we should be cautious of the optics of unjustly invoking phasing that you don’t feel is justified for the democratic party. To put it a bit more plainly it seems that you are quicker to try and reframe it in such a way that the criticism is not applicable for democrats. To me it seems utterly vital that we use language that is both true and harsh. Openly means without the secret channels governments often use, and nothing about the dems support of Israel is obtuse.
I think this is vital because I don’t think we can let slip the genocidal support of the previous administration be forgotten in the haze of the terrors of the current one.
The democratic party is a vicious and evil group that in the face of massive mounting evidence, continued to defend, and fund an on going genocide. In an age of perpetual wars and bombings, our ‘progressive’ party claimed they would ensure we would have “the most lethal military in the world.”
I don’t want to shy away from this because I think they are blood thirsty people, and should be portrayed as such, especially when it’s literally true.
They said ‘Trump could do a bad thing and it wouldn’t forgive Dems’, you said ‘so you’re willing to do bad thing?’
I simply don’t know how to make this point any more clear.
Where do they say they want or would support turning earth into a cloud of nuclear waste?
I guess at a point we have to ask what is the purpose of drawing that line. If China says it’s begrudgingly purging the Uyghurs due to their cultural beliefs and the land they ingenious to, are they not openly supporting genocide? Does it matter if they say they like it in press briefings when the only actions they take is to further violence and propagate the ongoing genocide?
Why is the hypothetical cruelty in their soul the deciding factor, when they are opening doing the work that supports a genocide?
They said the actions of the Trump don’t give justification for Biden’s actions. You said they are willing to kill 8 billion people. Do you see how you’ve projected a view onto them?
If you openly support, both verbally and functionally, an on-going genocide, you openly support genocide.
Just because they didn’t say “We want to genocide the Palestinians.” at a press meeting, doesn’t mean that they don’t openly support the genocide they were funding, blocking criticism for, and suppressing protest of.
So, you’re willing to kill 8 billion people and not actually save any?
You have entirely invented this comment.
The democratic party under Biden almost uniformly supported to the tune of billions of dollars in weapons, the ethnic cleansing, of Gaza. This is with knowledge of Israel using systemic sexual violence, collective punishment, school and hospital bombings, killing journalists and humanitarian aid workers, utilizing medical aid outfits as disguises for secret operations, and targeting civilian infrastructure.
It is not at all hyperbolic to state the plain fact they openly support genocide, as openly supporting the actions in Gaza is openly supporting a genocide.
lemmy.ca only has one??
I believe emby went proprietary, and jellyfin is the fork that stayed open source. Naturally Lemmy prefers the FOSS one 😅
Assuming you know them well enough, can’t you just give your IP address to folks and forward the port on your router?
Option 1: Remote playback with a Plex Pass
Upgrading to any Plex Pass subscription is a great option for server owners, as it ensures all users accessing the Plex Media Server can stream remotely, without an additional charge. Even if you don’t run your own Plex Media Server, a Plex Pass subscription will not only allow you to stream remotely from any server to which you have access, but also lets you make use of other Plex Pass functionality like Skip Intro and Skip Credits.
Sounds like weakness to me comrade.
I write code at my job, and it makes me faster at writing code.