data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11101/11101a2e1089ca2b100350a3a436bcaa2270037f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b66/a0b6666baa2926b33ebb55ccaec29fa9aaf08adf" alt=""
These are the kinds of highly plausible suppositions that I come here for.
These are the kinds of highly plausible suppositions that I come here for.
Well, I don’t know much about the resolving power and maximum refresh rate of human vision but I’m guessing that the monitor they described is close to the limit.
The analogy refers to someone who has their thinking constrained to the current situation. They didn’t imagine that computers would become resource-intensive multimedia machines, just as this person suggests the cable wouldn’t be asked to carry more data than would be necessary for the 8k monitor.
I can imagine a scenario with dual high resolution screens, cameras and location tracking data passing through a single cable for something like a future VR headset. This may end up needing quite a bit more data throughput than the single monitor–and that isn’t even thinking outside the box. That’s still the current use case.
Do you have a crystal ball over there? I still think it’s a clever analogy.
640k of RAM should be enough for anybody
Fair enough.
Just be sure to keep lubricated while you permit all that sliding.