Obligatory, “What’s a greek urn?” question.
Sometimes: a laughing hyena.
If you don’t have tested backups, you don’t have a backup.
Farts are funny. Will always be funny. It’s the follow-through that catches one unawares and dampens the mood.
Don’t stop laughing at stupid shit. The world gets very serious very quickly all on its own when you’re looking and when you’re not. If you can retain some ability to laugh, you’ll be much better off.
Am old fart: early Gen X.
However, it is better to say nothing and be thought a fool than speak and remove all doubt.
deleted by creator
That’s not really the point of a gotcha question. The point is to score a (valueless) point over the victim and let the victim know you’re (not you commenter) an arse.
“Have you voted? Your vote matters. Things can only change if you vote.” (UK oligarchy feudalism resident)
Fucking gotcha of my life, right there. Took a while before they knew it was a gotcha question though.
Compared to the alternative. Danniella Westbrook etc.
If you haven’t tested your backups, you ain’t got a backup.
Early 20 century comedy. Laurel and Hardy, Harold Lloyd, Marx Brothers, and all the rest. Not technically a series; sue me.
What kind of car is that?
It’s not really about warm or cold, it’s about how they get the bottle lid off, a snake not being an octopus.Especially now they have those lids-attached set-ups.
systemd seems to like mounting stuff on /media. However, I would consult the Linux filesystem hierarchy documents around (eg. Wikipedia and then follow the references) for the most compatible place.
/srv /mnt tend to suggest themselves. /home is for your personal stuff not shared user wide stuff.
Don’t put stuff in local directories, leave it in a NAS location and mount it where you need it using fstab or auto/mount units and the appropriate filesystem. Maybe I’ve misunderstood something you wrote to think of this last bit.
All we need now is a CodeTitanic, to make the story complete.
Life insurance companies would be changing their terms and conditions.
You’ve got concepts confused.
Having the judge make the inquisition has nothing to do with adversarial.
The judges in the UK and US are independent of the inquisition etc. The prosecution is responsible for obtaining evidence on behalf of the state. The defense defend their client with their evidence.
In Europe, I know a little more about France and Austria, the judges are trained to be inquisitorial and direct the inquisition for evidence. I should shut up at this point and let someone who actually knows what they are talking about continue for me.
As for adversarial, still waiting for the day that criminals, for the most part, exclaim like the very old British movies and Scooby Doo cartoons that “It’s a fair cop, guv!” and then explain why and how they did it.