They sent people to the jungle without shelter. Do you really think they plan to meet all of their needs? And if they are just doing their best to cope with the migrants, then the US is responsible for sending them to a place that could not handle them.

It’s not a separate issue at all, these people would not be in Panama at all if the US had followed its own laws, and these camps would not exist.

The US is calling the shots, you admitted they might not be following the law, and yet you expect the US to follow the rules they create and break? That’s a very niave outlook on global politics.

They are both places in which the government keeps people, exposed to the elements, only barely meeting their material needs, with the idea that such an arrangement is temporary.

Tell me, what differences between these camps and the Panama ones matter in a practical sense? The side of the border the detanees were born on?

Not with men inherently, but a plurality of men act a common way such that it’s worth examining.

Putting aside the cringe, why is this common amongst specifically boomers? Why are men the ones that enjoy quiet? Was it how boomer men were raised to expect their partner to be, or conditioning from spending all day at their job, likely socializing?

Her accomplishments are erased from public record, making it hard to prove she worked where she worked and affected her career.

It does if both parties are referring to a different noun

By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.

The words you use are good, but the context is bad.