• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s almost like the “You’re just panicking, Transpeople aren’t really being erased.” crowd were full of fucking shit.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    First they came for the Trans people, but I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t Trans.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You know I had a crazy thought yesterday… I’ve gone in the bathroom a bunch of times and never once have I tried looking at anybody else’s genitalia… Why the hell does anybody care about this?

      Edit: I mean not accepting people for being people everybody should just be cool with each other… What the government is doing is beyond evil and we need to do everything in our power to stop it.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You probably also don’t watch far right media all day. Fox News and it’s spawn have been fear mongering trans people almost non-stop for years now. That’s the entire disconnect from the right and normal people

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          And don’t forget conflating trans people and drag queens.

          Ever do a drag show? Even if you’re cishet?

          Sorry, you’re trans now.

  • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I fucking warned people that there was going to be a kind of trans genocide. I got told to shut up because “Gaza is a real genocide happening right now”

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    My only question starting today is " when are we going to do a massive protest? "

    I’m not saying 3 fat people walking around with copier paper sized art work. I’m talking, millions and millions of people Carrying helicopter readable banners and crates of water bottles to every single downtown.

    When is this fuckening? I want to be there. I want it to be a general strike where everything stops. No planes, no cars, no trains. We walk (after a normal commute maybe) and we stay until orange fuck boy gets the boot so hard that he goes flying past the helicopter and into the sunset with pretty boy Vance in his mouth and Elno in his ass.

    When???

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Random people online call for general strikes all the time but there’s no coordination or planning so nothing comes from them. However, there is one with real potential in the works being coordinated by an established union, United Auto Workers, with support from unions in several other industries. The date will be May 1, 2028, when many unions contracts with no-strike clauses have been coordinated to expire at once, and they are taking time to prepare, organize, and spread the word.

    • Yppm@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Google 50501

      50 states, 50 protests, 1 day.

      Feb 5th at your state capitol.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I searched “50501 protest” and got a lot of facebbok, instagram, and forum links. I can’t really find a single site listing all official information.

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    LGB is the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen.

    I’m not THAT young (born in the 90s) and even I’ve never ever seen LGB as an initialism without the T.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Born in the 70s here. I do remember LGB without the T in the 1990s and early 2000s, you probably were too young to pick up on the term. In any case, trans rights came into the spotlight much later than LGB rights.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This sort of thing is exactly why I say “queer” instead of using initials. Because you can keep adding more initials all day and you’re still going to be leaving people out that should be counted and you can take initials away like those people never counted to begin with. And it’s very easy for cishet people to ignore any of those letters individually and still act like they’re an ally.

      “Queer” may have negative roots, but it seems to be generally accepted as an inoffensive term today and, I think, more reflective of sexuality as a spectrum. I wouldn’t mind a better word to use without those negative roots, but I just can’t think of one.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This does seem rather practical as a catch-all term. LGBTQ+ is much too cumbersome

        I’ve already heard a bunch of queer people around the internet use “queer”, so I guess it just needs more adoption

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Queer is so much easier to say and is becoming safer to use without someone assuming you’re using it negatively.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Please keep telling me there’s no genocide of queer people in America. I hear that on Lemmy regularly these days.

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Any gender-affirming care for teenagers have been canceled, so the (non-tracked) suicide rate will already skyrocket. However right now the camps are only for “immigrants” and those who get caught by ICE as collateral damage of their hunt; trans people are in second place though. I assume first they’ll come for teenagers as well, ripping them out of their families who’ll get accused of child abuse (for trying to protect their trans kids), then the camps for everyone else will be build.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Any gender-affirming care for teenagers have been canceled

        Yeah, I doubt this… cis-boys getting their man-boobs removed, and cis-girls getting breast augmentations aren’t going to have any trouble.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I know. I think you missed the point of my comment.

            My point is that it’s still going to happen, it’s just being cancelled for trans people.

  • WiseWoodchuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Remember article 5 of NATO, an attack on a member is an attack on all members! We must show support for the trans and gender nonbinary communities while we organize with the hope of flipping the legislature in the midterms two years from now.

    • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      an attack on a member is an attack on all members!

      Yes!

      organize with the hope of flipping the legislature in the midterms two years from now.

      Jfc, no…

      What the fuck more will it take for people to understand that you can’t vote fascism away???!!!

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Republicans control all three branches of government. There is not a chance they will give any of that up voluntarily. And people still think elections will be in any way fair and free.

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lemmy is for some reason overcome with peak electoralism brainrot and thinks that instead of being the barest fucking minimum of effort, voting is actually the peak of political praxis. Frankly, it’s bizarre.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Since you can’t say guillotines, or the law would persecute Lemmy itself. If it happens, it won’t be televised, that’s for sure.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            There’s no law against saying things like, “we should all get together on courthouse squares across the country for collective action next weekend” that would persecute Lemmy. But people are no longer interested in collective action, it seems.

  • galanthus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Many countries do not recognise the X gender marker”

    Yeah, guess which country also doesn’t do that?

    • undefinedValue@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Doubt it. The LGB part of the equation aren’t hard for the average Joe to empathize with, they honestly would have skyrocketed in terms of acceptance years ago without the T group. The first 3 letters are just who you’re attracted to, the last letter is who you are and that’s a much bigger deal to a lot of people.

      • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Except, at least to my knowledge, there’s nowhere in the Bible that says mentions gender, but a couple of parts where it’s pretty explicit about acceptable sexuality.

        Doesn’t really matter though as these people can’t read to begin with.

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        they honestly would have skyrocketed in terms of acceptance years ago without the T group

        I’m gonna be honest, this seems like baseless speculation. At least by my flawed recollection, cis people barely thought about trans people at all over ten years ago. It’s taken a very well financed and concerted effort by the right to stir up as much hatred as they’ve managed to to this point.

      • syl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago
        1. Human Sexuality: We affirm God’s biblical design for marriage and family between one biological man and one biological woman, which has proven to be the foundation for all great nations in Western Civilization. We oppose homosexual marriage, regardless of state of origin. We urge the Texas Legislature to pass religious liberty protections for individuals, businesses, and government officials who believe marriage is between one man and one woman. We oppose the granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for sexual behavior or identity, regardless of state of origin. We oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose non-traditional sexual behavior out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values.
        1. Definition of Marriage and Family: We support the definition of marriage as a God-ordained, legal, and moral covenant only between one biological man and one biological woman. Further, we support a traditional definition of family with only one biological man in the role of father and one biological woman in the role of mother. We are opposed to same-sex parenting, intentionally subjecting a child to the loss of their biological father or mother, and other non-traditional definitions of family
        1. Homosexuality: Homosexuality is an abnormal lifestyle choice. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state of origin, and we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values. No one should be granted special legal status based on their LGBTQ+ identification.

        from the official 2024 Texas GOP platform: https://texasgop.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2024-RPT-Platform.pdf