I was gonna title this “And here I sit so patiently waiting to find out what price you have to pay to get out of going through all these things twice” and then write “Stuck inside of America with the fascism blues again” here, but I’m not sure if that comes off like gloating and that’s honestly the last thing I want to do this morning.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 个月前

    I can’t believe the bullshit with the Cheneys. When a war criminal like Dick Cheney endorses you, you disavow them.

    Harris even got endorsed by Richard Spencer, who’s a white nationalist, and she didn’t say shit! What was she thinking? “I’ve got the neocon vote, now maybe I’ll get the Nazi vote”?

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 个月前

    Democrats were too busy making sure progressive candidates were banned from participating in democracy.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 个月前

    Democrats are completely out of touch. them expecting voters putting other issues on top of them making ends meets and food on the table (like mocking Vance’s egg prices ), all the while most polls showing the economy is the biggest concern with 38 % of all voters, is just simply delusional

    And they have lost both the popular and electoral college vote. meaning the real problem here is them.

    And don’t get me started on the propaganda of Iowa’s early voters polls showing a Kamala landslide just 2 days before election day. If you live in a left wing bubble and believe this shit, than this should be a hard smack back into reality.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 个月前

      The economy is in an objectively better position than when the GOP had office. The fault does lie with the dems, but if the economy was a concern as 38% of people said, then they would have voted democrat. The fact is they went too far right, floundered on their support of a genocide and failed to speak bluntly on matters such as healthcare outside of abortion.

      I think people say the economy when asked as a catch all when they dont know what to say.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        The “economy” does not help people pay their bills. And the unit of measurement only says something about the whole. The fact that a small portion of the people actually profit from this better economy is the issue, the unit of measurement has no bearing on normal people.

        And now, we will see what trade tarrifs will do, and gutting the administration and filling it with partisan players (loyalty > capability). And what gutting protection and health agencies will do.

        Now that it’s done I personally am morbidly curious what Trump, Vance, Kennedy and Musk can do to America in the next term (and possibly beyond). I really wonder if this will be as dark as it can be… but the project 2025 ghouls are scary as fuck.

        What is the over under on a national abortion ban in the US?

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 个月前

          https://www.statista.com/statistics/1351276/wage-growth-vs-inflation-us/

          Trump fucked it, Biden unfucked it better than any other country in the world after Covid, and Biden got the blame.

          As is tradition. Universally. It’s one of the few things in American politics that always happens in exactly the same way, with no real wiggle room depending on how you want to measure things or who you ask for the explanation.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._economic_performance_by_presidential_party

          Both rich people and working people do better under Democrats, and both rich people and working people do worse under Republicans. Always.

          • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 个月前

            Exact same happened to Obama and the 2008 recession. Getting blamed for shit that happened before the election even took place. But Democrats refuse to play the blame game, people got to spout the lies about things being cheaper when Trump was in office unchallenged, and the Dems refused to promote solid solutions to even the most basic of core issues like antitrust, price controls, higher minimum wage, or even fucking climate change.

            And now, with so many fewer people turning out to vote for Dems, even Trump’s lies about voter fraud will have been validated in the minds of the morons, who will attribute those low numbers to harsher rules stopping the fraud.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 个月前

      So I guess people actually think Trump and Musk are going to help them with their egg prices?

      • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 个月前

        Yes, you might find it stupid or illogical, but they (trump , elmo) are seen as smart and successful, and they lived under better circumstances in the last Trump term.

        That’s democracy, everyone has a say, whether their opinions or feelings are right or wrong. but instead of the democrats putting the work to meet these people they have chosen to belittle them. and that has cost them so far the Presidency and the Senate.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 个月前

          “they lived under better circumstances in the last Trump term”

          They lived under fucking Covid in the last Trump term, when everyone was confined to their homes while supply lines disintegrated and the cost of food more than doubled, while ashes from rampant forest fires rained down from a blood red sky.

  • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 个月前

    Everyone from Sanders to Dick fucking Cheney endorsed Harris. Anyone who was paying any attention and wasn’t a literal fascist voted for her. The direction of the swing seems irrelevant.

    The swing fell short because it’s not so much about direction than strength. Macron in 2017 ran the most “hard center” presidential campaign imaginable. Difference is it worked, not because his centrist program was particularly novel but in large part because he is a very charismatic figure and managed to create a voting base of hopefuls for himself. The same can broadly be argued about Obama (whose first act as president was to essentially absolve the previous administration and Wall St of their many sins in case anyone forgot how moderate he was).

    Harris ran on a platform of… “I’m not him”. Which to any reasonable person is an obvious “yeah OK”, but unfortunately most Americans are apathetic cretins who will refuse to move their asses to a polling station if the guy on the telly doesn’t promise them a blowie at the voting booth. And the Democrat establishment is simultaneously too big to fail and incapable of producing an actually charismatic leader.

    Well, all that and the obvious election interference from Musk, Putin, and the ontological inability of traditional media not to platform literal fascists.

    • SoJB@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 个月前

      “How did you vote on your California ballot with several highly contentious ballot measures, Madam Vice President”

      “I will not speak on this 5 days before the election.”

      Leftists have been telling all the libs exactly what this path would lead to.

      Looks like liberals ushered in a fascist regime, again. Funny how that always happens.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 个月前

    Swinging left wouldn’t have worked either.

    There is no high horse. There is no right path. Us Americans have the critical thinking skill of an ant. The left should have fought dirty with a full blown propaganda machine, populist lies, and blatant collusion if they wanted to win, simple as that.

    It needs a leftist Trump.

    What are Republican’s gonna do… demonize democrats even more?

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 个月前

      Swinging left wouldn’t have worked either.

      It absolutely would have. Progressive policy is insanely popular and easy to campaign on by virtue of being designed to help everyone. Do you think Bernie had such high favorably ratings because they have a thing for 80 year old white dudes?

      Tell people “healthcare will be free” or “We will cap rent and build housing that won’t cost more than 3x local median income” and then people can’t afford not to vote for you.

      Biden could have cut off arms to Israel, and hundreds of thousands of students so politically activated they’re willing to risk their degrees to protest would be doing everything in their power to keep Trump out.

      Instead they sent the police to kick the shit out of those kids, at great expense to the colleges, and called them antisemitic.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 个月前

        Tell people “healthcare will be free” or “We will cap rent and build housing that won’t cost more than 3x local median income” and then people can’t afford not to vote for you.

        1. It would have to go through congress, which wouldn’t approve it, so it would be a lie.
        2. They told people “I won’t do mass deportations or order the assassinations of my enemies” and it didn’t work. Why do you assume that this other stuff would?
        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 个月前
          1. It would have to go through congress, which wouldn’t approve it, so it would be a lie.

          The policies are extremely popular and universal. Doesn’t really matter in a politicalcampaign if you struggle to achieve those ends. Trying is important and failing gives you ammunition against those who oppose extremely popular policies for next campaign.

          1. They told people “I won’t do mass deportations or order the assassinations of my enemies” and it didn’t work. Why do you assume that this other stuff would?

          The bottom line is that the average person isn’t listening for anything besides “how is the candidate going to help me because I feel like I’m drowning”. The right scapegoats something and promises to fix your problems by hurting the scapegoat (immigrants, minorities, socialists, whatever). This is a lie, but it’s just as, if not more, direct of a solution so some voters will support them.

          Harris had attention when she said things like stopping price gouging and providing in-home elder care. Those were extremely popular ideas that she didn’t focus on. Instead, she pivoted right.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 个月前

          It would have to go through congress, which wouldn’t approve it, so it would be a lie.

          The US president is probably the single most powerful position in the world between explicit powers and people who serve at his pleasure and can be replaced at will, and undefined powers that that extend as far as anyone is able to stop them, as we saw under Trump. If they just flagrantly broke the law and kept doing it until the SCOTUS and others actually stopped them, the dems would be far more popular than just throwing their hands up and saying "better things aren’t possible.

          There’s a lot of indirect ways they can get what they want done, whether it means appointing an AG and other department heads who will punish people who don’t go along or using the military’s vast legal protections and resources.

          They told people “I won’t do mass deportations

          1. That’s not saying how you’ll improve people’s immediate conditions, just that trump will make them worse

          2. You can’t credibly say that when Biden deported more people than Trump.

          • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 个月前

            If they just flagrantly broke the law and kept doing it until the SCOTUS and others actually stopped them, the dems would be far more popular than just throwing their hands up and saying "better things aren’t possible.

            This is basically what FDR did with a lot of his social and work programs during his presidency. He’d establish an agency or authority or whatever, regardless of the legality, and by the time the court’s or whoever made the decision to close it, they’d have 5 others going simultaneously, and/or they’d make another one. And the process would start all over again.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 个月前

              Yup. The nice thing about policy that helps everyone is that it’s incredibly unpopular to kill. Biden could have burned student debt in the most visible way possible, and then dared the SCOTUS to create new debt. If they took the bait, you’d have 46.2 million people ready to vote for anyone who promises to expand the SCOTUS.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 个月前

        I’m afraid exit polls say otherwise. Kamala’s economic policies were the most left wing we’ve seen in decades (a wealth tax?). If people cared about actual economic issues, such as inequality, they’d have elected her.

        This election was lost because Latino men voted for Trump (for starters). We needed populism, not progressivism, to appeal to the small minded American voter. Don’t you see that? Most American men are misogynistic, racist psychos. And they’re unhappy. You appeal to them with populism full stop.

        • yogurt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 个月前

          Wealth tax to collect more money to give to Israel and the most lethal military and killing immigrants is what she ran on, she ran as a right wing populist and lost because Trump is a better right wing populist

          Small minded voters are told what to think, Harris refused to tell them to want free healthcare because that shit pisses off donors

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 个月前

    I don’t even care whether your attitude is, “Oh no, we fucked up,” or you go with option B which is what you’re saying. If you have to wonder whether you’re gloating or not, then fuck you.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 个月前

        No post mortem. Blind support for neoliberalism is the only way.

        “Now’s not the time”

        “Nobody could have predicted this”

        etc…

        As one of the dozens of people who are not American, I was chatting to my cousin the other day, and he said that after seeing the amount of dead kids that have come out of Gaza this year, and taking a mental health week off work due to the anxiety of watching the world not give a shit, he hopes Trump gets elected and America collapses into civil war… That Americans suffer for what their government has done, and is doing. He’s not a bad guy. Bad guys don’t have breakdowns from watching foreign children murdered.

        I can’t logically support his view, but I completely emotionally understand it. He knew Trump would be objectively worse for humanity, but is a fascist genocide that kills 2 million people better than a fascist genocide that kills 5 million people? At that point you’re really just splitting hairs between failed states, and systems that deserve to be burned to the ground. After enough chances, opportunities, and desensitisation, you want the schadenfreude of watching the American electorate who voted for Trump shooting themselves in the face, destroying their livelihoods and lineage, along with all of their false patriotism and exceptionalism. I still suspect the conserva-russian PsyOps to be the main source of Trumps win, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Israel’s genocide is the straw that broke the Dems back.